An Efficient Method for Enhancing the Satellite Image Based on Multi Resolution Analysis

                                                                                                                                                            

Sumathi M1*, Dr. V Krishna Murthi2

1Research scholar, Department of ECE, North East Frontier Technical University, Sipu Puyi, Aalo (P.O), Arunachal Pradesh.

2Professor, Department of ECE, North East Frontier Technical University, Sipu Puyi, Aalo (P.O), Arunachal Pradesh.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: sumathiphd16@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

An image resolution enhancement technique which is based on the interpolation of the high frequency sub bands obtained by DWT is proposed in this paper. The proposed technique uses DWT to crumble an image into different sub bands, and then the high frequency sub band images have been interpolated. An original image is interpolated with half of the interpolation factor used for interpolation the high frequency sub bands. Afterwards all these images have been united using IDWT to produce a super determined image. The proposed technique has been experienced on well known benchmark images, where their PSNR, Mean Square Error shows the dominance of proposed technique over the predictable and state of art image resolution enhancement techniques.

 

KEYWORDS: Bicubic Interpolation, Discrete wavelet transform, Hidden Markov model

 

 


1. INTRODUCTION:

Satellite images are used in many applications such as geosciences studies, astronomy, and geographical information systems. One of the most important quality factors in images comes from its resolution. Interpolation in image processing is a well known method to increase the resolution of a digital image. Interpolation has been widely used in many image processing applications such as facial reconstruction, multiple descriptions coding, and resolution enhancement. A new framework for statistical signal processing based on wavelet-domain hidden Markov models (HMM’s) that concisely models the statistical dependencies and non-Gaussian statistics encountered in real-world signals is developed in [1]

 

Efficient expectation maximization algorithms are developed for fitting the HMM’s to observational signal data.

 

A wavelet domain image resolution enhancement algorithm is developed in [2]. A primary high-resolution approximation to the original image is obtained by means of WZP and is further processed using the CS methodology which reduces ringing. An efficient edge algorithm is used for the description of edge degradations such as blurring due to loss of resolution. Linear regression using a minimal training set of high-resolution originals is finally employed to rectify the degraded edges. A multiple description image coding scheme is proposed to facilitate the transmission of images over media with possible packet loss and is based on finding the optimal reconstruction filter coefficients that will be used to reconstruct lost descriptions in [3].

 

For this purpose initially, the original image is down sampled and each sub image is coded using standard JPEG. These decoded images are then mapped to the original image size using the optimal filters. Interpolation of the high-frequency sub band images obtained by dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DT-CWT) is proposed in [4]. DT-CWT is used to decompose an input low-resolution satellite image into different sub bands. Then, the high-frequency sub band images and the input image are interpolated, to generate a new HR image by using inverse DT-CWT.

 

The resolution enhancement is achieved by using directional selectivity provided by the CWT, where the high-frequency sub bands in six different directions contribute to the sharpness of the high-frequency details such as edges. Super resolution is used for resolution enhancement of images or video sequences. Instead of super resolving frames globally, using localized motion based super resolution increases the quality of the enhanced frames. The super resolution on different sub bands of localized moving regions extracted from discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and composing the super resolved sub bands using inverse DWT (IDWT) to generate the respective enhanced high resolution frame in [5].

 

2. METHODOLOGIES:

The proposed Image Enhancement system is based on DWT. In this following section the theoretical background of all the approaches are introduced.

 

2.1 Discrete Wavelet Transform

Nowadays, wavelets have been used quite frequently in image processing and used for feature extraction, de-noising, compression, face recognition, and image super-resolution. The decomposition of images into different frequency ranges permits the isolation of the frequency components introduced by “intrinsic deformations” or “extrinsic factors” into certain sub-bands. This process results in isolating small changes in an image mainly in high frequency sub-band images.

 

The 2-D wavelet decomposition of an image is performed by applying 1-D DWT along the rows of the image first, and, then, the results are decomposed along the columns. This operation results in four decomposed sub-band images referred to as low–low (LL), low–high (LH), high–low (HL), and high–high (HH). The frequency components of those sub-band images as shown in Figure 1 (b) cover the frequency components of the original image in Figure 1 (a).

 

(a)                                          (b)

Figure 1 (a) Input Image (b) 2-D Wavelet decomposition

 

2.2 Interpolation Techniques

Interpolation is the process of estimating the values of a continuous function from discrete samples. Image processing applications of interpolation include image magnification or reduction, sub pixel image registration, to correct spatial distortions, and image decompression, as well as others. Of the many image interpolation techniques available, nearest neighbor, bilinear and cubic convolution are the most common, and will be talked about here.

 

Since, Interpolation provides a perfect reconstruction of a continuous function, provided that the data was obtained by uniform sampling at or above the Nyquist rate. Since Interpolation does not give good results within an image processing environment, since image data is generally acquired at a much lower sampling rate. The mapping between the unknown high-resolution image and the low-resolution image is not invertible, and thus a unique solution to the inverse problem cannot be computed. One of the essential aspects of interpolation is efficiency since the amount of data associated with digital images is large.

 

2.2.1 Bilinear Interpolation

Bilinear Interpolation determines the grey level value from the weighted average of the four closest pixels to the specified input coordinates, and assigns that value to the output coordinates. First, two linear interpolations are performed in one direction and then one more linear interpolation is performed in the perpendicular direction.For one-dimension Linear Interpolation, the number of grid points needed to evaluate the interpolation function is two. For Bilinear Interpolation (linear interpolation in two dimensions), the number of grid points needed to evaluate the interpolation function is four [6]. For linear interpolation, the interpolation kernel is:

where,  is the distance between the point to be interpolated and the grid point being considered. The interpolation coefficients

 

Figure 2 Bilinear Interpolation

 

2.2.2 Bicubic Convolution Interpolation

Cubic Convolution Interpolation determines the grey level value from the weighted average of the 16 closest pixels to the specified input coordinates, and assigns that value to the output coordinates. The image is slightly sharper than that produced by Bilinear Interpolation, and it does not have the disjointed appearance produced by Nearest Neighbour Interpolation. First, four one-dimension cubic convolutions are performed in one direction and then one more one-dimension cubic convolution is performed in the perpendicular direction. This means that to implement a two-dimension cubic convolution, a one-dimension cubic convolution is all that is needed. For one-dimension Cubic Convolution Interpolation, the number of grid points needed to evaluate the interpolation function is four, two grid points on either side of the point under consideration. For Bicubic Interpolation (cubic convolution interpolation in two dimensions), the number of grid points needed to evaluate the interpolation function is16, two grid points on either side of the point under consideration for both horizontal and vertical directions [7] . The original image quality is poor, but the contrast between the pixilation of sampling and the smoother bicubic interpolation can be observed in Figure 3.

 

 

Figure 3 Bicubically Interpolated Image

 

 

Figure 4 Comparison of bilinear and bicubic interpolation

 

3. PROPOSED METHOD

A colour satellite image is taken as an input and this image is decomposed by using DWT. After applying DWT the image gets decomposed into four different sub bands like low–low (LL), low–high (LH), high–low (HL), and high–high (HH).

 

 


 

Figure 5 Block Diagram of the Proposed method

 


In order to find the difference image, the original input image and LL subband obtained from the decomposition using DWT is subtracted. An original image is interpolated with half of the interpolation factor used for interpolation the high frequency sub bands. Finally inverse DWT is applied to retrieve the enhanced image.

 

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS.

The quantitative (peak signal to noise ratio and root mean square error) and visual results show the superiority of the proposed technique over the conventional and state of art image resolution enhancement techniques. Table 1 gives the performance measure based on MSE and PSNR. An example output of the enhanced image is shown in figure 6.

 

Table1: Performance evaluation based on MSE and PSNR

Name of the image

MSE

PSNR(db)

Sample

0.54881

51.1043

Sample1

0.91155

49.1323

Sample2

0.45454

55.4235

 

Figure 6 Enhanced Image

 

 

Figure 7 Graphical Representation of MSE and PSNR

 

5. CONCLUSION:

This paper has proposed a new resolution enhancement technique based on the interpolation of the high-frequency sub band images obtained by DWT and the input image. The proposed technique has been tested on well-known benchmark images, where their PSNR and RMSE and visual results show the superiority of the proposed technique over the conventional and state-of-art image resolution enhancement techniques.

 

REFERENCES:

1.     H. Demirel, G. Anbarjafari, and S. Izadpanahi, “Improved motion-based localized super resolution technique using discrete wavelet transform for low resolution video enhancement,” in Proc. 17th EUSIPCO, Edinburgh, U.K., Aug. 2009, pp. 1097–1101.

2.     T. Celik, C. Direkoglu, H. Ozkaramanli, H. Demirel, and M. Uyguroglu, “Region-based super-resolution aided facial feature extraction from lowresolution video sequences,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, Philadelphia, PA, Mar. 2005, vol. II, pp. 789–792.

3.     H. Demirel and G. Anbarjafari, “Satellite image resolution enhancement using complex wavelet transform”, IEEE Geo science Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 123–126, Jan. 2010.

4.     L. Yi-bo, X. Hong, and Z. Sen-yue, “The wrinkle generation method for facial reconstruction based on extraction of partition wrinkle line features and fractal interpolation,” in Proc. 4th ICIG, Aug. 22–24, 2007, pp. 933–937.

5.     Y. Rener, J. Wei, and C. Ken, “Down sample-based multiple description coding and post-processing of decoding,” in Proc. 27th CCC, Jul. 16–18, 2008, pp. 253–256

6.     O.Harikrishna and A.Maheshwari, “Satellite Image Resolution Enhancement using DWT Technique”, International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), ISSN: 2231 2307, Vol.2, no.5, November 2012

7.     Battula. R.V.S. Narayana, “Image Resolution Enhancement by Using Stationary and Discrete Wavelet Decomposition”, I.J. Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, 2012, 11, pp 41-46

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 12.08.2016          Modified on 07.09.2016

Accepted on 12.09.2016        © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2016; 9(9):1325-1328.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00252.3